Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Celica also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 116 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 154 - 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 6.1 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 12.4 | 7.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Celica has
| |