Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 286 HP | 280 - 359 HP | |
Torque: | 407 NM | 366 - 492 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 4.1 - 6.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 12.4 | 14.2 | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.28 m | 1.48 m | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`040 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 25 000 | 45 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution has
| |