Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 286 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
Torque: | 407 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 12.4 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.28 m | 1.47 m | |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 19 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi 3000 GT can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`796 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 25 000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |