Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Honda Civic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda Civic has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Civic can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 | 1.4 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 90 - 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 120 - 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 9.2 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 12.4 | 6.4 - 7.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT petrol engines consumes on average 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 11 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`572 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Honda Civic has
| |