Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1992 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mitsubishi 3000 GT is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 407 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 12.4 | 10.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is smaller. Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 35 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi 3000 GT is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 923 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`872 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |