Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Chrysler Voyager 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes Vito engine produces 20 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 14 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |