Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 172 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.6 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
Mercedes Vito engine produces 16 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Despite the higher power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.1 | |
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.58 m | |
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 18 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 26 cm higher. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | 212 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 212 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1714 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |