Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes Vito engine produces 13 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 13.3 | |
|
The Mercedes Vito is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Mercedes Vito over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes Vito engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is smaller, but higher. Mercedes Vito is 41 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |