Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Seat Alhambra 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes Vito engine produces 7 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 10.1 | |
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.73 m | |
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 4 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.7 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |