Mercedes Vito 1999 vs Hyundai H1 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 22.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes Vito is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes Vito engine produces 31 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Hyundai H1. Thanks to more power Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 8.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 13.2 | |
|
The Mercedes Vito is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Mercedes Vito over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 490 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes Vito engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Mercedes Vito is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3295 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |