Mercedes Vito 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes Vito engine produces 7 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.5 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes Vito engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 40 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |