Mercedes Vito 1999 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes Vito engine produces 13 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 3 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.5 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |