Mercedes Vito 2003 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 6 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Seat Alhambra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Alhambra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.76 m | |
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |