Mercedes Vito 2003 vs Opel Vivaro 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 5 HP less power than Opel Vivaro, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Opel Vivaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Vivaro) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.44 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3100 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
| |