Mercedes Vito 2003 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.4 seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes Vito engine produces 17 HP less power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Caravelle. Due to the lower power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Caravelle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.95 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has
| |