Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Renault Trafic 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
Mercedes Vito engine produces 21 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Trafic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.94 m | |
Mercedes Vito is 23 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes Vito is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 730 litres | 1240 litres | |
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes Vito has 510 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. This could mean that the Mercedes Vito uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`790 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 20 200 | 15 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |