Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 2009

	Mercedes Vito 2010 -	Volkswagen Caravelle 2009 -
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.1 Diesel	2.0 Diesel
Performance
Power:	95 HP	140 HP
Torque:	250 NM	340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	n/a seconds	14.2 seconds
	Mercedes Vito engine produces 45 HP less power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volkswagen Caravelle.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	no data	7.8
Fuel tank capacity:	75 litres	80 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	Front wheel drive (FWD)
	Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Caravelle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.
Dimensions
Length:	5.01 m	4.89 m
Width:	1.90 m	1.90 m
Height:	1.90 m	1.99 m
	Mercedes Vito is 12 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caravelle, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes Vito is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	730 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	11.8 meters	no data
Gross weight (kg):	3`050	3`000

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	no data	no data
Average price (€):	19 200	22 200
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes Vito has lower price	Volkswagen Caravelle has more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 2009

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions