Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Mercedes Vito engine produces 89 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Seat Alhambra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Alhambra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.01 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.72 m | |
Mercedes Vito is 15 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes Vito is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 730 litres | 267 litres | |
Mercedes Vito has more luggage capacity. Mercedes Vito has 463 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`550 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 15 800 | 15 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |