Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 172 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 77 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.3 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is smaller, but higher. Mercedes Vito is 33 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 748 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4550 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Mercedes Vito has 318 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |