Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Renault Trafic 2015
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Mercedes Vito engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Renault Trafic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Trafic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.96 m | |
Height: | 1.90 m | 1.97 m | |
Mercedes Vito is smaller. Mercedes Vito is 24 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 1000 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Mercedes Vito has 570 litres less trunk space than the Renault Trafic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`770 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 20 200 | 12 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Trafic has
| |