Mercedes Vito 2010 vs Opel Vivaro 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 25 HP less power than Opel Vivaro, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Opel Vivaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Vivaro) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is smaller. Mercedes Vito is 24 cm shorter than the Opel Vivaro, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 1000 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3200 litres | |
|
Opel Vivaro has more luggage space. Mercedes Vito has 570 litres less trunk space than the Opel Vivaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`050 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Opel Vivaro has
| |