Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Toyota Previa 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.3 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 98 - 174 HP | 116 - 156 HP | |
Torque: | 210 - 237 NM | 225 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 20.6 seconds | 10.9 - 13.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 13.8 | 7.2 - 10.8 | |
Mercedes Vito petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Previa. On average, Mercedes Vito equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.66 m | 4.75 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
Mercedes Vito is 9 cm shorter than the Toyota Previa, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 2`227 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |