Mercedes GL 2012 vs Mercedes ML 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 5.5 | 2.1 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 - 558 HP | 204 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 - 760 NM | 370 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | 6.1 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 12.3 | 6.0 - 9.3 | |
|
Mercedes GL petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Mercedes GL equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.12 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Mercedes GL is larger. Mercedes GL is 32 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes GL is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 680 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2300 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mercedes GL has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. This could mean that the Mercedes GL uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GL is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Mercedes GL can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`250 | ~ 2`917 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |