Mercedes A class 1999 vs Peugeot 206 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 206 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes A class engine produces 13 HP less power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Peugeot 206. Due to the lower power, Mercedes A class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes A class consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes A class could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes A class consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 206 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.58 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mercedes A class is 24 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes A class is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1130 litres | |
|
Mercedes A class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes A class has 105 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The Peugeot 206 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes A class is 0.8 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Mercedes A class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`540 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mercedes A class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes A class, so Mercedes A class quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes A klase has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |