Mercedes A class 2008 vs Mazda 2 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes A class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes A class engine produces 14 HP more power than Mazda 2, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Mercedes A class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes A class consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes A class could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes A class consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 110 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 2110 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 2390 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 1890 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes A class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 2 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mercedes B klase | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mercedes A class is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes A class is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1995 litres | 787 litres | |
|
Mercedes A class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes A class has 186 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The Mazda 2 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 1208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mazda 2 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes A class, so Mazda 2 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes A klase has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |