Mercedes A class 2020 vs Mazda 3 2016

 
Mercedes A class
2020 - 2022
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 320 NM380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds8 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes A class and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Mercedes A class torque is 60 NM less than Mazda 3. Mercedes A class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.93.9
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes A class consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes A class could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 43 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle1300 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway1450 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 104 mm (4.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.55 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.78 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes A class is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 395 litres419 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Mercedes A class has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes A class is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mercedes A class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`980 kg1`910 kg
Net weight:1`405 kg1`320 kg
Load capacity:575 kg590 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 25 80010 800
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • higher ground clearance
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv