Mercedes A class 1997 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 125 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 180 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 18.8 seconds | 9.6 - 12.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.2 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Mercedes A class petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Mercedes A class equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.58 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mercedes A class is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes A class is 76 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mercedes A class has 160 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`527 | ~ 1`958 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes A klase has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |