Mazda Xedos 6 1992 vs Volvo S40 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda Xedos 6) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S40) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Xedos 6 engine produces 45 HP more power than Volvo S40, but torque is 40 NM less than Volvo S40. Thanks to more power Mazda Xedos 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 5.4 | |
|
The Volvo S40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 6 consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 6 could require 555 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
| Mazda Xedos 6 is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 853 litres | |
|
Volvo S40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 81 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Mazda Xedos 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 6 has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |