Mazda Xedos 6 1992 vs Audi 80 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 165 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
Mazda Xedos 6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Xedos 6 engine produces 31 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Mazda Xedos 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.5 | |
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 6 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 6 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 9 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.41 m | |
Mazda Xedos 6 is 8 cm longer than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
Audi 80 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Mazda Xedos 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`690 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 6 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |