Mazda Xedos 6 1992 vs Audi 80 1991

 
Mazda Xedos 6
1992 - 1998
Audi 80
1991 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 147 HP116 HP
Torque: 175 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds11.8 seconds
Mazda Xedos 6 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda Xedos 6 engine produces 31 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Mazda Xedos 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.18.5
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda Xedos 6 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 6 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
850 km on highway1100 km on highway
Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi 80 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 9Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 100
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 6 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.36 m1.41 m
Mazda Xedos 6 is 8 cm longer than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
Audi 80 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Mazda Xedos 6 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7001`690
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 1000800
Pros and Cons: Mazda Xedos 6 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 80 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv