Mazda Xedos 6 1992 vs Rover 400 1998

 
Mazda Xedos 6
1992 - 1998
Rover 400
1998 - 1999
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 114 HP115 HP
Torque: 139 NM143 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds12.7 seconds
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda Xedos 6 engine produces 1 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Mazda Xedos 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.98.8
The Mazda Xedos 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda Xedos 6 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Mazda Xedos 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway750 km on highway
Mazda Xedos 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.49 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.34 m1.39 m
Mazda Xedos 6 is 7 cm longer than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data810 litres
Rover 400 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 400.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6451`640
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Mazda Xedos 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Rover 400 has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv