Mazda Xedos 6 1992 vs Rover 400 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 139 NM | 143 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Xedos 6 engine produces 1 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Mazda Xedos 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.8 | |
The Mazda Xedos 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 6 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Mazda Xedos 6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Mazda Xedos 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.34 m | 1.39 m | |
Mazda Xedos 6 is 7 cm longer than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
Rover 400 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 6 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |