Mazda Xedos 6 1998 vs Rover 400 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Xedos 6 engine produces 5 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Mazda Xedos 6 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.1 | |
|
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 6 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 25, Rover 200, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda Xedos 6 1998 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda Xedos 6 1998 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mazda Xedos 6 is 7 cm longer than the Rover 400, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 6 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 6 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 6 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 6 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 400. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 6 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |