Mazda Premacy 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Premacy engine produces 10 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda Premacy 2000 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |