Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Premacy and Toyota Picnic have the same engine power, but Mazda Premacy torque is 15 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Mazda Premacy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Premacy has 240 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 8 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |