Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Opel Combo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Premacy engine produces 25 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.4 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Premacy consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 2 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage space. Mazda Premacy has 35 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Opel Combo has
| |