Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 22 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.4 | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Premacy consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 323 | Used also on Nissan Almera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Premacy might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1950 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Premacy has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. This could mean that the Mazda Premacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |