Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 13 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda Premacy consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Picnic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |