Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 40 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mazda Premacy is smaller. Mazda Premacy is 30 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 240 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 1608 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mazda Premacy has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mazda Premacy quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |