Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 36 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 52 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Premacy consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1800 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Premacy has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. This could mean that the Mazda Premacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 48 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mazda Premacy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |