Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 77 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Lexus IS | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Corolla Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mazda Premacy is smaller. Mazda Premacy is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
| Mazda Premacy has 3 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Mazda Premacy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |