Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Mazda Premacy engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Despite less power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda Premacy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics. One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla Verso 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mazda Premacy is smaller. Mazda Premacy is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 423 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
| Mazda Premacy has 3 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Mazda Premacy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla Verso, so Toyota Corolla Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |