Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Premacy engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 30 NM more than Renault Scenic. Despite less power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda Premacy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 17 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |