Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Opel Combo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Premacy engine produces 25 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Combo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Meriva, Opel Corsa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Combo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Mazda Premacy is larger, but lower. Mazda Premacy is 2 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Premacy has 35 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. This could mean that the Mazda Premacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Opel Combo has
| |