Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mazda Premacy) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford C-Max) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 65 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda Premacy 2001 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 1 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |