Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000

 
Mazda Premacy
2001 - 2005
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 100 HP90 HP
Torque: 230 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 seconds14.5 seconds
Mazda Premacy is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda Premacy engine produces 10 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.45.5
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1300 km on highway
870 km with real consumption1000 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 6 years7 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Citroen Xsara Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.34 m4.28 m
Width: 1.70 m1.75 m
Height: 1.60 m1.64 m
Mazda Premacy is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1848 litresno data
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Mazda Premacy has 130 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Mazda Premacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Mazda Premacy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8451`850
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: Mazda Premacy has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv