Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Mazda Premacy is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Premacy engine produces 10 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
870 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Citroen Xsara Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
Mazda Premacy is 6 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Premacy has 130 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This could mean that the Mazda Premacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Mazda Premacy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`845 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |