Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Mazda Premacy engine produces 5 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. Despite less power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Premacy consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Mazda Premacy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda MPV | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera Tino might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Almera Tino engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1950 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Premacy has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. This could mean that the Mazda Premacy uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 102 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |