Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Ford C-Max 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda MPV | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.60 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 1 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |