Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.3 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Premacy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda MPV | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda Premacy is smaller, but slightly higher. Mazda Premacy is 3 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 32 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mazda Premacy has 130 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 228 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |