Mazda Premacy 2001 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Premacy engine produces 33 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mazda Premacy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Premacy consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Premacy could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Premacy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise.
One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.53 m | |
| Mazda Premacy is 54 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda Premacy has more luggage capacity. Mazda Premacy has 145 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mazda Premacy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda Premacy has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 10.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |