Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda Premacy
1999 - 2001
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Body: Minivan / MPVEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.01.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 115 HP100 - 136 HP
Torque: 152 - 230 NM152 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 - 12.9 seconds10.5 - 12.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 9.26.3 - 9.1
Mazda Premacy petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Mazda Premacy equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.68 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.57 m1.52 m
Mazda Premacy is smaller, but higher.
Mazda Premacy is 38 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Premacy is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1848 litres1677 litres
Mazda Premacy has 120 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 171 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`784~ 1`866
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 800600
Pros and Cons: Mazda Premacy has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
Mazda 626 has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv