Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 115 HP | 90 - 128 HP | |
Torque: | 152 - 230 NM | 178 - 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 - 12.9 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.2 | 7.7 - 9.5 | |
Mazda Premacy petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. On average, Mazda Premacy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.57 m | 1.62 m | |
Mazda Premacy is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 180 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1848 litres | 1840 litres | |
Mazda Premacy has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Premacy has 240 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 8 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`784 | ~ 2`007 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Premacy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |