Mazda Premacy 1999 vs Toyota Picnic 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda Premacy
1999 - 2001
Toyota Picnic
1996 - 2001
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.02.0 - 2.2

Performance

Power: 90 - 115 HP90 - 128 HP
Torque: 152 - 230 NM178 - 205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.4 - 12.9 seconds10.8 - 13.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 9.27.7 - 9.5
Mazda Premacy petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. On average, Mazda Premacy equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.53 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.57 m1.62 m
Mazda Premacy is 23 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Premacy is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres180 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1848 litres1840 litres
Mazda Premacy has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mazda Premacy has 240 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 8 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda Premacy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`784~ 2`007
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 8002200
Pros and Cons: Mazda Premacy has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Toyota Picnic has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv